6 April 2020

Engagements and Etiquette


So many stories of ancestors and relatives are mentioned in the newspapers of the past. During April 2020 for the A - Z blog challenge, I am listing the types of stories or information I have found in newspapers with examples for each letter of the alphabet. My clippings include a variety of articles about my children's ancestors and those ancestors relatives.

E for Engagements, Entertainments, Elections, Estate notices and Etiquette

All of these can be found in papers from the past. Here's a few engagement notices through 2 generations of Galvin families. In engagement notices the female's surname is usually the first named followed by the male's surname. If parents are mentioned, there may be details of their residence, marital status or whether deceased. Where a mother has re-married her new surname may appear in the notice too.

1917 Engagement of John Michael Galvin and Grace Walmsley Payne

In this notice we can determine that both of his parents were living. Grace's mother is referred to but by this time Grace's father Edward John William Payne had disappeared from their lives. This couple are great grandparents of my children.
1917 'ENGAGEMENT.', Chronicle (Adelaide, SA : 1895 - 1954), 14 April, p. 50. ,
http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article87442918

1926 engagement of Francis William Galvin to Clarice Tonkin

Francis William was 3 years younger than John Michael mentioned above. He was 27 when engaged whereas John Michael had not turned 21 at the time of his engagement. Their mother Catherine had died in 1923 and is mentioned here as the "late Mrs Galvin."
1926 'Family Notices', Chronicle (Adelaide, SA : 1895 - 1954), 30 January, p. 41. ,
http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article89635995

The next generation

1939 engagement of John Dominic Galvin to Phyllis Yvonne Stirling

By 1939 John was a fully qualified pilot and was posted to 3 Sqn in Richmond, New South Wales. In October of that year the dashing young pilot announced his engagement. John was 21 years old and Phyll was 19. There is no mention of Phyll's mother in this notice.

1939 'Family Notices', The Sydney Morning Herald (NSW : 1842 - 1954), 17 October, p. 8. ,
http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article17644919

1954 engagement of Colin Francis Galvin to Marie Liebeknecht

In this announcement we see that Colin's parents Francis William and Clarice are now living at Tailem Bend, South Australia and Colin who had been working in Leigh Creek is engaged to a local girl.
1954 'Family Notices', The Advertiser (Adelaide, SA : 1931 - 1954), 18 May, p. 32. ,
 http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article48122415

Etiquette

While searching through engagement notices in the New Zealand Papers Past I came across this gem offering girls advice on etiquette after engagement. Enjoy!

Rodney and Otamatea Times, Waitemata and Kaipara Gazette, 15 May 1912, Page 2 https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ROTWKG19120515.2.8.3

Next up - F Functions and Final Farewells

 This post first appeared on earlieryears.blogspot.com by CRGalvin

10 comments:

  1. Oh my, doesn’t it make you glad you weren’t engaged in that time period.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes indeed, I think we may have been the lucky generation.

      Delete
  2. Those engagement instructions are perturbing -- I doubt there were similar edicts for men who became engaged!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ha, I doubt that! a man's world particularly back then.

      Delete
  3. When my paternal grandmother saw me dancing with a bf at our house party, she was horrified! She told me later that night that she never even held hands with my grandfather until they were engaged! Oh my!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Perhaps they were chaperoned when in each others company too, hard to imagine in this day and age.

      Delete
  4. How times have changed. For the better?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. An interesting thought to ponder, no doubt our parents probably thought our era was lax and it is difficult for those of our generation to accept some of the behaviours and attitudes of those much younger than us. Better or worse, always up for debate I think.

      Delete
  5. Just occurred to me...do you remember when it was consider poor etiquette to congratulate a woman on getting engaged? I think it was because it implied she might never catch a man.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That I don't remember but perhaps an engagement was not necessarily considered a true commitment to marriage but rather just an exploratory phase.

      Delete

Thanks for visiting, I welcome your comments. All comments are moderated before publication.

Harrigan Horgan Hogan

Johanna (Horgan) Hogan What's in a name? Well it depended on how you pronounced it, how a clerk may have heard it and how it was written...